The Four Technologies at a Glance #

Optical Media (CD‑R, DVD‑R) #

  • Capacity per medium: under 5 GB, far too small for modern archives
  • Access: slow, manual media handling
  • : physical, cannot be bypassed
  • Status: obsolete; reader hardware is disappearing. Relevant only for reading legacy archives.

Tape (WORM Cartridges) #

  • Capacity per medium: high (multiple terabytes per cartridge)
  • Access: sequential; retrieving a single record means loading and winding a cartridge
  • : enforced by cartridge firmware, solid in itself
  • Operational reality: media handling, off-site logistics, periodic migration of every cartridge, drive and robotics maintenance, and no way to verify integrity without loading each tape
  • Status: being replaced by disk-based hardware , which delivers the same immutability with random access, online verification, and no media handling

Hardware WORM on Disk (Silent Cubes) #

  • Capacity: scales from terabytes upward by adding units
  • Access: random access at NAS speed; any record retrievable in seconds
  • : enforced by the storage system itself; cannot be bypassed with admin rights
  • Integrity: continuous online verification; Silent Cubes add redundant storage with erasure coding, designed for very long retention
  • Cost profile: higher entry price than generic storage, low operating effort, no media logistics
  • Status: the standard for professional

Software WORM (Object Lock, Retention Flags) #

  • Capacity: whatever the underlying storage provides
  • Access: fast and flexible
  • : enforced by software; depending on configuration, privileged accounts can change policies or destroy the underlying storage
  • Compliance: acceptable only with strong organizational controls, and the weaker evidence in an audit
  • Status: useful as an additional layer, not as the sole basis for statutory archives

Recommendation by Use Case #

Small organizations (low archive volume): Software plus strict organizational controls can be a starting point, but be aware that the burden of proof in an audit rests on your processes, not on the technology. Entry-level hardware removes that risk.

Mid-sized organizations: Hardware (Silent Cubes) for the compliance archive, combined with air-gapped backups (Silent Brick System) for operational recovery. This separates the two jobs cleanly: the archive proves integrity, the backup restores operations.

Large organizations and critical infrastructure: Hardware in a multi-system, multi-site setup with replication. Erasure-coded redundancy and online integrity verification scale; media-based archives do not.

Cloud-first environments: Object lock features provide a software layer, but you depend on the provider’s implementation and jurisdiction. For records subject to statutory retention, keep the authoritative copy on hardware under your own control; cloud copies are a supplement, not the primary archive.


Further Resources #

Guide (/en/blog/revisionssicherheit-leitfaden/) → Storage Fundamentals (/en/blog/worm-speicher-grundlagen/) → Software vs. Hardware (/en/blog/software-worm-vs-hardware-worm/) → Silent Cubes: Hardware Archive Storage (/en/produkte/silent-cubes/)

Disclaimer

This article was written by our editorial team and edited using AI. It provides a general overview and does not constitute legal advice – we recommend seeking professional advice for your specific situation.